From Media Temple to WebFaction

Car tyres are something that you should never have to worry about. Although you might check them for air pressure and tread wear occasionally, most of the time you’re quite happy to just let them do their job. After all, you’ve got more important things to do, like getting to where you’re driving to. You’d be forgiven for taking a good set of tyres for granted, so when they blow out, you really take notice.

And with that analogy neatly set up, it’s time to move on to web hosting. Since about 2002, Thunderbolt was hosted by a friend of mine at his company, Larrytech. It was a great arrangement; I could call him up if I needed support and if we exceeded our bandwidth, he increased it without charging us exorbitant penalty fees. However, about a year ago, the server we were on had a hard drive failure. They had a backup, but it was three days old and a number of other files were corrupted. It wasn’t a tragedy by any means, but it made me realise how vulnerable we were to these kind of events.

Media Temple

Media Temple’s shiny website.

So I looked around and found Media Temple. Their Grid-Service plan is impressive to say the least; 100GB of storage, 1TB of monthly bandwidth, up to 100 domains and most importantly, the ability to survive traffic spikes and hardware failures. Add in their sexy website and a slick control panel, and you’ve got a very tempting deal.

I opened an account in February 2008 and started hosting this blog there. I gradually added a couple of other sites and then when we launched the most recent version of Thunderbolt, I moved that over too. Everything was consolidated, safe in one place. Well, at least that’s what I thought.

Twitter

A few of the many responses on Twitter.

It turns out that this new-fangled grid hosting that Media Temple are pioneers of isn’t quite ready for production use. In the week that I moved Thunderbolt over to the Grid-Service, it suffered from slow performance for three days. I couldn’t work out what was wrong; something to do with Thunderbolt or the host itself. After a few days though, the issues cleared up and the site ran smoothly. I even got a MySQL Container – dedicated resources for your databases – free for a month as compensation.

However, last week, part of the Grid-Service ground to a halt. For 40 hours. Forty! Fortunately, we weren’t on the part of the Grid-Service that was affected, but I could smell the danger. It could have been us and it could have been at any time. Thunderbolt might not be a commercial website, but we can’t afford to be vulnerable to that sort of outage.

So earlier this week, I signed up with WebFaction. They offer more traditional shared hosting plans which are cheaper than Media Temple and offer very similar features. Most importantly though, I liked the phrase “Over 99.9% uptime”. There was a healthy lack of complaints on Twitter (in massive contrast to Media Temple) and their servers are located at The Planet, one of the world’s leading data centres. They also backup your account daily for free and keep them for 10 days, which is a huge bonus.

The contrast between Media Temple and WebFaction is immediately noticeable when you login. While the former’s control panel is smooth, the latter’s is humble and workman-like. Gone are the graphical user interfaces for cron jobs and password protected folders; here you have to do those tasks on the command line.

WebFaction

Creating an application on WebFaction is nice and easy.

WebFaction has one awesome trump card up its sleeve though; applications. On the Grid-Service, each of your domains has a corresponding folder and you simply put your code in there for it to run. However, WebFaction has a three part model consisting of domains, applications and websites. It works roughly like this; you add a domain, then you create an application, then tie the two together as a website. What makes this awesome is that you can setup an application in a single click. Want a Rails app? Done. Subversion repository? Click and it’s ready. There’s a huge list of available applications and it saves you a massive amount of time working on the command line. It’s hard to explain how it works in practice, but take a look at their tutorial video and it should all make sense.

I’ve also seen an increase in the speed of sites that I’ve moved over to WebFaction. My WordPress control panel is certainly snappier and on Pingdom’s full page load test, all of my sites have been performing better. So for a quarter of the price of Media Temple (once you include the value of my free Container upgrade), I’m getting a faster service on WebFaction.

Yesterday, I finished transferring all of my websites over to WebFaction. All that’s left on Media Temple are my domains, because WebFaction can’t host them. The switch has been easier than I anticipated and I now hope that I can learn to take hosting for granted again.

Update: I’ve also posted the results of latency monitoring which show the difference between response times on WebFaction and Media Temple.

Comments

  1. Noel Hurtley says:

    I had a similar experience with MediaTemple’s grid service, what a disgrace. I switched to WebFaction last spring and I couldn’t be happier with my decision.

  2. Noel Hurtley says:

    Nice site by the way! It’s great to see so many new designs built on grids.

  3. Thanks, the grid is based on the one Jason Santa Maria used in his 24 Ways article.

  4. James Nisbet says:

    Yeah good article – I agree entirely – but instead of moving to another host entirely I took a baby step and moved to MediaTemple’s (dv) service – mainly to save me the hassle of moving. It seems to be 100x better. Thank god.

  5. Thanks. I thought about going to a (dv), but it seemed silly paying $50 when WebFaction costs $12 and would give us similar performance.

  6. Ates Goral says:

    What is your username at WebFaction? In case you convince (I’m about to be) people to sign up with WebFaction, you may be up for some referral bonuses :)

  7. It’s “philipmorton”. Thanks! :)

  8. Adam Maltis says:

    I have had my fair share of hosting issues, and not one single hosting provider is perfect. They ALL have their fair share of issues. The smaller companies such as WebFaction don’t have as many customers, so the issues they have don’t resonate as loud, plain and simple. I am currently with Media Temple and very happy. I am not about to talk smack against a company that has done me right. I wait to hear you complain when WebFaction causes you trouble. You sound like the type that is waiting for an error, just so you can twitter or blog about it.

  9. Angry WebFaction User says:

    From: http://statusblog.webfaction.com/web-69-down

    “Web 69 is currently down. Its root partition went read only and rebooting it revealed an issue which we are currently working on resolving now. We will post updates as they are available.

    It appears to be an issue with the RAID controller and we are currently replacing the hardware and restoring all data from backup.”

    This is serious stuff.

  10. Adam, of course all web hosts have issues, but it’s the frequency and severity of them that counts. During the last month, the Grid-Service has had an unacceptable level of outages and performance woes.

    Don’t get me wrong; Media Temple aren’t a bad company. The support they gave me was generally excellent and the featues on (gs) are great, but if you can’t do the most fundamental thing right, then you’re going to lose customers.

    As for being “the type that is waiting for an error, just so you can twitter or blog about it”, I don’t think that’s fair. I used the Grid-Service for a year before I posted this, during which I’ve never complained about their service. However, this was when I had non-critical websites on the service and so any outages had little impact. However, when I moved my main website on there, the poor performance really hit home and I felt that I had to move.

  11. Hi Philip,

    Thanks for your post.
    I was wondering how your experience has been with WebFaction since the post? Have you had any issues?

    I’m considering moving from Dreamhost to either WebFaction, midPhase or Media Temple (gs). I’ve used MT’s (dv) offering before, but it was an expensive and more complex system than I really needed.

    Cheers.

  12. In the 10 weeks or so since I switched to WebFaction, I think I’ve had an hour or so of downtime. The speed of my sites has been the big improvement though, as shown by the other post I’ve linked to at the end of this post.

    I also looked at the (dv), but came to the same conclusion as you.

Add a comment